That is a word made up in the English language. And, when the quack doctors in the late 1800s were pushing circumcision for bogus medical benefits, the Christian churches were silent. I hope you see the arbitrariness of it. We keep going back to it every now and then, trying to make sure there isn't too much time between sessions as she claims it makes it more difficult to go back to it afterwards. There absolutely must not be any pressure whatsoever. Some have tried to argue and still do today as Jonadab has pointed out that oral sex or hand jobs or any sex outside of vaginal intercourse is sinful and wrong. If we look at Genesis 19 it is when one man forcibly has anal sex with another man.
This is an example of an unfit comparison. There are many bloggers out there claiming to be Christian who cherry pick a few chapters and verse and then take these out of context to legitimate whatever they wish to do. There are many of us who believe that it is possible, even likely, that the ancient Hebrews picked up the practice of male circumcision in Egypt and much later justified it by asserting that male circumcision was the sign of the Old Covenant — perhaps when pubescent males questioned the need for such a practice. Some Christians make an argument against anal sex based on the health risks it presents. . He did not design the male body for sex with another male body and he did not design the female body for sex with another female body.
The word Sodomite is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word for male temple prostitute and while these prostitutes may have engaged in anal sex they also engaged in many other sex acts including normal sexual intercourse. It might not actually be. Let the reader examine both our arguments and then seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in this matter. She would go so far as to email people to try to slander my reputation as being a gossip, leading me to be banned at several sites. Putting it all together, the arguments from scripture, the deductions, the natural law expediencies the case that anal sex is a sin is underwhelming, certainly not bullet-proof. When men have sex with men they are going against the natural design of their bodies and when women have sex with women they are going against the natural design of their bodies.
As is bearing a false witness. V26 is a reference to women who do not have sex with men, but replaced them with other women. However the same cannot be said for anal sex under normal circumstances. When a controversial claim is made, should that claim be unchallenged for the sake of peace and unity? Our disagreement does not rise to the level of disunity, but a healthy iron sharpening iron exercise of our own thinking and application of scripture. This is not talking about a wife enduring bloody beatings from her husband because he comes home angry and wants a punching bag. That should have clued you in that you were off track. I may even find that most of the content of modern movies does not help me to love God more, I err when I condemn all movies as sin not just because I am incorrect, but because I accuse my brother and harm his conscience and perhaps his reputation.
The anus has neither the properties of natural lubrication or expansion. But I must say that I do know of many Christian husbands including but certainly not limited to myself where we do sometimes have to take an authoritative tone with our wife. But, one needs to question why men and apparently some women desire anal sex. Under the principle of modesty, some have attempted to codify how a woman should dress. Lube is not optional for all things anal-play. The natural biological structures penis and vagina are obviously designed for each other.
He could have made us like fish where the woman lays eggs and the man fertilizes those eggs. Instead this body part was designed for one purpose and one purpose alone — the release of gas from the body and the release of waste from the body. So I would argue and I have argued in posts and various comments that the Church had it all backwards about the vagina and sex in general. They in effect tithe their mint and cumin and leave the weightier matters of the law undone. We can even discuss as we do sometimes here what parts of the Bible still apply to us as New Testament Christians like that we no longer have to make animal sacrifices but we accept that even those parts which are not binding to us now in this New Testament age were still the inspired Word of God.
It is the combination of all these factors that makes the case. However you only need to look at many medical websites to find out that if doctors are being honest they will tell you the strength of the lining in the anus is not strong enough. I belong to a confessional church, that uses the Westminster Confession of faith to keep us on the rails. Begging, coercing and constantly bringing it up again after a hard no is, to put it like an 85 year-old auntie, most unbecoming. If a woman were to go to the doctor and explain that she is having painful vaginal intercourse the doctor will tell her that is not normal and they need to look into reasons why that is happening. However often times we feel competition with someone without our spouse ever saying a word. With all due respect, I posit that you made several errors in logic in arriving at your conclusion.
Either way, in this situation the woman, as the receiving partner, takes the risk of harm, not the man. Biggest problem right now is it's been months since we tried and I don't know how to really bring it up now to practice. The other ditch is to ignore those risks altogether, refusing prudent measures, this is loveless concern on the part of the husband. If a woman does not want anal sex, her husband should accept that. There is no disagreement that the vagina is designed to receive the penis in order to reproduce.
I could shoot some bullets and point out some inconsistencies and arbitrariness in the conclusion, but it is unnecessary because the case is insufficient. Romans 1:26-27 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. The shameless acts is simply men with men; there is no reference to the use of the anus, and I am positive Paul would have been just as offended if all two men were doing was holding hands and french kissing. Last night we shared a simultaneous orgasm during anal and it was incredible. Did the porn industry just meet an already existing consumer demand to see anal sex portrayed on screen? Many Christian wives pat themselves on the back and kid themselves that they are sexually submissive to their husbands simply because they spread their legs when he asks for sex. If you move too quickly, you could wind up in serious pain.